Second, as David Colquhoun says, what’s needed here is evidence. What we’re essentially trying to do here is operationalise and quantify the *quality* of science (and scientists). Is that even possible? Maybe not. But we simply don’t know. All we are doing at the moment is making assumptions, one way or the other. JIF has somehow evolved to be a proxy for quality, and a very bad one at that.


Satisfied customers are saying